Peec alternatives
If you are measuring AI visibility with Peec and wondering what a first-party approach would show instead, this is the honest version of that comparison.
What Peec says it does
Peec describes itself as AI Search Analytics for marketing teams and SEO agencies, monitoring brand visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini.
- Tracking across ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini
- Model selection during setup
- Country-level tracking
- Daily and weekly reporting
- Projects, from one on Starter to five on Advanced
| Plan | Published price | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | €85 / month | €70/month billed annually. One project. |
| Pro | €205 / month | €180/month billed annually. Two projects. |
| Advanced | €425 / month | €360/month billed annually. Five projects. |
| Enterprise | Custom | Annual terms through sales. |
Peec pricing and features read from the vendor’s own site on 2026-08-06. Prices and features change. If anything here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
What your Peec data means
Country-level visibility across six surfaces is a genuinely wide net, and if you sell into several markets that breadth is hard to reproduce by other means. It tells you where you are being named and where you are absent.
It does not tell you what that presence produced. The move from "we appear in Gemini answers in Germany" to "German AI traffic converts at this rate and is worth this much" requires your own analytics, and no amount of polling substitutes for it.
What carries over and what does not
Your prompt set and your market segmentation carry over as thinking. Veribix runs name-free category prompts against a shared corpus, so covering a broad category costs little; prompts containing your brand or a competitor's stay private to you.
Stored answers do not transfer between vendors, and a figure whose provenance cannot be shown does not belong in a report. Your analytics history, however, is already yours — so the first-party side of the picture starts populated.
Running both
Peec's breadth and first-party attribution answer different halves of the same question, and running both is a defensible allocation if the budget exists.
If it does not, decide by the question you are actually being asked. "Where are we absent?" is Peec's question. "What did AI search bring in?" is answered from your own data or not at all.
Before you decide
Confirm which markets you actually sell into against which markets you are tracking. Country-level visibility across six surfaces is a large surface to pay for, and paying for markets you do not serve is the most common quiet waste in this category.
Then look at whether your analytics can already separate AI referrals by country. It usually can, for the portion that carries a referring page, and that free reading is the right baseline before adding anything.
And check what share of your AI traffic arrives with no referring page at all. Your analytics can tell you how large the direct-traffic bucket is; it cannot tell you how much of it began in an assistant, which is exactly the uncertainty any vendor in this category has to be honest about.
Questions
- Why does this page show prices when other comparison sites say Peec does not publish them?
- Peec renders its pricing client-side, so an automated read of the page source finds nothing. The figures here were read from the rendered page on the date shown. If they are out of date, tell us and we will correct them.
- Does Veribix cover as many AI surfaces as Peec?
- No. Peec lists six surfaces including Google's AI Mode. If breadth of polling is the deciding factor, that is a real difference and it favours Peec.
- Can Veribix segment by country?
- Yes, for first-party data, because your analytics property already carries geography. Answer polling geography depends on the plan.
For a side-by-side of what each product measures, see Veribix vs Peec.