Siftly alternatives
If you are measuring AI visibility with Siftly and wondering what a first-party approach would show instead, this is the honest version of that comparison.
What Siftly says it does
Siftly describes itself as covering every AI engine that matters, combining visibility monitoring with content distribution and citation outreach.
- Response volume metered per month, from 100 on Free to 108,000 on Scale
- Unique prompt tracking, from 10 on Free to 150 on Scale
- Competitor tracking included from the free plan
- Citation outreach campaigns and content auto-publish on paid tiers
- AI bot crawl tracking with GA4 and Search Console on the Scale plan
| Plan | Published price | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 / month | 100 responses, 10 prompts, weekly refresh, 30-day history. |
| Starter | $79 / month | 4,500 responses, 50 prompts. Annual billing saves 20%. |
| Growth | $249 / month | 30,000 responses, 100 prompts. |
| Scale | $599 / month | 108,000 responses, 150 prompts, AI bot crawl tracking with GA4 and Search Console. |
Siftly pricing and features read from the vendor’s own site on 2026-08-06. Prices and features change. If anything here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
What your Siftly data means
Response-metered monitoring gives you repeated sampling, which is the right shape for a measurement whose underlying answer moves. If you have been reading it as a share across runs rather than as a single reading, you have been reading it correctly.
If you are on Scale you already have crawl tracking joined to GA4, and the question between the two products narrows considerably — it becomes one about how the joined figure is evidenced and labelled rather than about whether the join exists.
What carries over and what does not
Prompts and competitor sets carry over as decisions. Veribix runs name-free category prompts against a shared corpus, which changes the economics of a wide prompt set compared with per-response metering.
Stored responses do not transfer between vendors. Your own analytics and logs need no transfer at all, which is the quiet advantage of first-party measurement: the history is already sitting there.
Running both
Siftly's free tier and Veribix's free audit make a side-by-side comparison inexpensive, and comparing two independent readings of the same period is a reasonable way to decide.
Where Siftly adds content distribution and outreach campaigns, Veribix deliberately does not. If those motions are part of why you bought the tool, that is a reason to keep it that has nothing to do with measurement.
Before you decide
If you are on the Scale plan you already have crawl tracking joined to your analytics, and the comparison narrows sharply. The remaining question is whether each figure carries its evidence and a confidence label, not whether the join exists.
If you are on a lower plan, the join is not included, and comparing Siftly's entry tiers to a first-party product is comparing two different categories of thing.
And check what your response allowance buys per prompt. Thirty thousand responses spread across a hundred prompts is three hundred readings each, which is generous; the same allowance across a thousand prompts is thirty, which is not.
Questions
- Siftly's Scale plan already includes GA4 and crawl tracking. What does Veribix add?
- The join is available from the entry point rather than at the top tier, and each figure carries a confidence label and a link to its evidence. Whether that is worth a switch depends on how much the provenance matters to whoever reads your reports.
- Does Veribix do citation outreach?
- No. Veribix measures; it does not run campaigns or publish content on your behalf.
- How does Veribix count sampling?
- Results are reported as the share of runs in which a company appeared, with the number of runs shown alongside. A single reading is treated as a sample, never as a settled figure.
For a side-by-side of what each product measures, see Veribix vs Siftly.